Welcome to the new beta version of legal500.com Visit the legacy site

North America - United States • Dispute resolution

King & Spalding LLP

More informationMore information

Among King & Spalding LLP’s sector strong suits, the appellate practice stands out for its expertise in life sciences and healthcare-related cases, where it can act hand-in-hand with the wider firm’s dominant life sciences group. Other key areas of activity include energy, environmental and IP-related matters, while geographically it is particularly noted for its presence in Florida appeals. In a highlight example of its strength in the pharmaceutical sphere, Washington DC-based department co-head Ashley Parrish successfully represented Novo Nordisk in a Third Circuit appeal challenging efforts to expand the scope of manufacturers’ obligations under the federal 340B drug pricing program. The group also draws on fellow department co-lead Jeffrey Bucholtz, based in Washington DC, and California appellate specialist Anne Voigts, who splits her time between Silicon Valley and San Francisco.

Legal 500 Editorial commentary

Key clients

  • A coalition of furniture industry clients
  • ABB
  • Abbvie
  • American Clinical Laboratory Association
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Chevron Corporation
  • Delta
  • Eli Lilly
  • Empire Health Foundation
  • Equifax
  • Everport Terminals
  • Federal Reserve Banks
  • Guardian Pharmacy
  • Halliburton
  • Hope Medical Enterprises, Inc. dba Hope Pharmaceuticals
  • Huntington Ingalls Industries
  • JW Aluminum
  • Molina Healthcare
  • Novo Nordisk
  • ORIX
  • Procter & Gamble
  • R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
  • Silicon Valley Corporation
  • Snap
  • Tivity Health
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce
  • Volkswagen
  • Walmart

Work highlights

  • Successfully represented JW Aluminum before the Eleventh Circuit in a case concerning the application of the Bankruptcy Code to pension labilities under the Coal Act.
  • Secured a victory for Novo Nordisk in a Third Circuit appeal challenging efforts to expand the scope of manufacturers’ obligations under the federal 340B drug pricing program.
  • Successfully defeated a petition for certiorari filed by South Carolina seeking judicial review of a decision issued by the Fourth Circuit granting habeas corpus relief in favor of a death penalty client.

Practice head

The lawyer(s) leading their teams.

Jeffrey Bucholtz, Ashley Parrish

Other key lawyers

Anne Voigts, Paul Mezzina